<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The future of genealogy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://famresearch.wordpress.com/2012/02/03/the-future-of-genealogy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://famresearch.wordpress.com/2012/02/03/the-future-of-genealogy/</link>
	<description>Discoveries and reflections</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 05:27:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rebelhand</title>
		<link>http://famresearch.wordpress.com/2012/02/03/the-future-of-genealogy/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rebelhand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://famresearch.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Kerry, a very useful and thought-provoking overview. I share your concern about the quick and easy answer and the copy and paste approach to a family tree.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Kerry, a very useful and thought-provoking overview. I share your concern about the quick and easy answer and the copy and paste approach to a family tree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry Farmer</title>
		<link>http://famresearch.wordpress.com/2012/02/03/the-future-of-genealogy/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerry Farmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://famresearch.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kylie,

I do think in early 40s still counts as &quot;younger bracket of genealogy researchers&quot;, but I have found more people younger still at some of the talks I&#039;ve given. 

As the age range of those researching grows, it should become easier for anyone to go to eg a genealogy society, hopefully without getting &#039;funny looks&#039;. The ongoing learning required (about the genealogy &#039;facts&#039; but also the technology required to find those facts) means that there is something for all of us to learn. Hopefully the chance to use the latest technology will attract a younger audience too.

I applaud your sharing by teaching technology - I&#039;ve found genealogists usually extremely generous with sharing and helping others. After all most of us learnt by the generosity of others sharing with us.

What do think will be possible for genealogists where you live, even 20 years from now? Will the smaller genealogy survive the shift to more records online?  Any ideas about how (or whether) we&#039;ll be searching for records say in 30 years?

Kerry]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kylie,</p>
<p>I do think in early 40s still counts as &#8220;younger bracket of genealogy researchers&#8221;, but I have found more people younger still at some of the talks I&#8217;ve given. </p>
<p>As the age range of those researching grows, it should become easier for anyone to go to eg a genealogy society, hopefully without getting &#8216;funny looks&#8217;. The ongoing learning required (about the genealogy &#8216;facts&#8217; but also the technology required to find those facts) means that there is something for all of us to learn. Hopefully the chance to use the latest technology will attract a younger audience too.</p>
<p>I applaud your sharing by teaching technology &#8211; I&#8217;ve found genealogists usually extremely generous with sharing and helping others. After all most of us learnt by the generosity of others sharing with us.</p>
<p>What do think will be possible for genealogists where you live, even 20 years from now? Will the smaller genealogy survive the shift to more records online?  Any ideas about how (or whether) we&#8217;ll be searching for records say in 30 years?</p>
<p>Kerry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kylie</title>
		<link>http://famresearch.wordpress.com/2012/02/03/the-future-of-genealogy/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kylie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://famresearch.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kerry
Being in my early 40s do I fit into the younger bracket of genealogy researchers?  I certainly get my share of funny looks when I go to my local genealogical society :-)

I do have the advantage of loving technology but I also share that love by teaching others how to use it too.  I use the Internet for research but I also visit libraries, societies, museums, towns where my ancestors lived etc and read, read, read!!!!

&quot;My ideal&quot; for the future is that people would share more.  Share their knowledge, finances, resources, and expertise so that fewer people are left behind.  

Kylie]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kerry<br />
Being in my early 40s do I fit into the younger bracket of genealogy researchers?  I certainly get my share of funny looks when I go to my local genealogical society <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I do have the advantage of loving technology but I also share that love by teaching others how to use it too.  I use the Internet for research but I also visit libraries, societies, museums, towns where my ancestors lived etc and read, read, read!!!!</p>
<p>&#8220;My ideal&#8221; for the future is that people would share more.  Share their knowledge, finances, resources, and expertise so that fewer people are left behind.  </p>
<p>Kylie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry Farmer</title>
		<link>http://famresearch.wordpress.com/2012/02/03/the-future-of-genealogy/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerry Farmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://famresearch.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SALT LAKE CITY — By 2060 nearly 7 billion people will participate in family history, FamilySearch’s former Chief Executive Officer Jay Verkler told attendees at RootsTech. 
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705398611/RootsTech-speaker-predicts-7-billion-to-participate-in-genealogy.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SALT LAKE CITY — By 2060 nearly 7 billion people will participate in family history, FamilySearch’s former Chief Executive Officer Jay Verkler told attendees at RootsTech.<br />
<a href="http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705398611/RootsTech-speaker-predicts-7-billion-to-participate-in-genealogy.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705398611/RootsTech-speaker-predicts-7-billion-to-participate-in-genealogy.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry Farmer</title>
		<link>http://famresearch.wordpress.com/2012/02/03/the-future-of-genealogy/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerry Farmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://famresearch.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[3,000 people attended RootsTech 2011. I&#039;ve just read that on day 1 (today) 2012, that number has risen to more than 4,400!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3,000 people attended RootsTech 2011. I&#8217;ve just read that on day 1 (today) 2012, that number has risen to more than 4,400!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
